<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who loses in current blogger poly debate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boyinthebands.com/archives/who-loses-in-current-blogger-poly-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/who-loses-in-current-blogger-poly-debate/</link>
	<description>Scott Wells on the practice of Christian faith</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/who-loses-in-current-blogger-poly-debate/#comment-40436</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boyinthebands.com/archives/who-loses-in-current-blogger-poly-debate/#comment-40436</guid>
		<description>I'm a member of UUPA. Actually, everything we've been able to determine is that keeping us out was not what the IA decision was about -- but that in a vacuum of explanation or discussion from the UUA board, people are naturally filling the vacuum with conspiracy theories. This is human nature. (Especially blogging nature.)

Also, for the record, UUPA has not applied for IA status under the new setup and probably won't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a member of UUPA. Actually, everything we&#8217;ve been able to determine is that keeping us out was not what the IA decision was about &#8212; but that in a vacuum of explanation or discussion from the UUA board, people are naturally filling the vacuum with conspiracy theories. This is human nature. (Especially blogging nature.)</p>
<p>Also, for the record, UUPA has not applied for IA status under the new setup and probably won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
