<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vestments: it&#8217;s not about me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boyinthebands.com/archives/vestments-its-not-about-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/vestments-its-not-about-me/</link>
	<description>Scott Wells on the practice of Christian faith</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Gatheringwater</title>
		<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/vestments-its-not-about-me/comment-page-1/#comment-10288</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Gatheringwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universalistchurch.net/boyinthebands/archives/vestments-its-not-about-me/#comment-10288</guid>
		<description>Scott,

All the time I've been reading Boy in the Bands, I thought they were a joke, what with the funny title and all. I didn't realize that you were actually serious about this stuff. Please excuse my attempt at humor; I wanted to share a joke, not ridicule you. And thanks for answering my questions. I don't know much about clerical vestments and would like to learn, even if I would not choose to wear them myself.

I can see the value of your argument concerning uniform vesture and I agree that ministry is not primarily about the minister. Wouldn't your argument work better, however, if it related to a pre-existing uniform vesture among Unitarian Universalist ministers? By adopting a style of vesture that is uncommon if not singular among Unitarian Universalist ministers, aren't you in fact emphasizing your distinctness, rather than your uniformity?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>All the time I&#8217;ve been reading Boy in the Bands, I thought they were a joke, what with the funny title and all. I didn&#8217;t realize that you were actually serious about this stuff. Please excuse my attempt at humor; I wanted to share a joke, not ridicule you. And thanks for answering my questions. I don&#8217;t know much about clerical vestments and would like to learn, even if I would not choose to wear them myself.</p>
<p>I can see the value of your argument concerning uniform vesture and I agree that ministry is not primarily about the minister. Wouldn&#8217;t your argument work better, however, if it related to a pre-existing uniform vesture among Unitarian Universalist ministers? By adopting a style of vesture that is uncommon if not singular among Unitarian Universalist ministers, aren&#8217;t you in fact emphasizing your distinctness, rather than your uniformity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
