Comments on: Third time’s a charm http://boyinthebands.com/archives/third-times-a-charm/ Scott Wells on the practice of Christian faith Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:12:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Boy in the bands » Blog Archive » Guest: Perception? http://boyinthebands.com/archives/third-times-a-charm/comment-page-1/#comment-17246 Boy in the bands » Blog Archive » Guest: Perception? Sat, 03 Dec 2005 02:46:03 +0000 http://www.universalistchurch.net/boyinthebands/archives/third-times-a-charm/#comment-17246 [...] the association’s web. Had it stayed at that, I think I would have declined because we’d touched on this before. A comment by uuwonk prompted m [...] [...] the association’s web. Had it stayed at that, I think I would have declined because we’d touched on this before. A comment by uuwonk prompted m [...]

]]> By: Derek http://boyinthebands.com/archives/third-times-a-charm/comment-page-1/#comment-13421 Derek Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:21:11 +0000 http://www.universalistchurch.net/boyinthebands/archives/third-times-a-charm/#comment-13421 - I've had a growing discomfort with Sinkford's use of the UUA website as a vehicle for self promotion. But this over-exposure began early in his presidency, when a large number of front-page posting began to be about him. I would expect this kind of exposure on a denominational web-site where the denomination is episcopal in polity. So why, in a congregationaly governed denomination, do we have a president who is exposed on the UUA website as if he were minister to a national congregation? Maybe I'm quibbling over small details, but I thought we were still the Unitarian Universalist Association of CongregationS (the big-S is to emphasize plural congregations). - I’ve had a growing discomfort with Sinkford’s use of the UUA website as a vehicle for self promotion. But this over-exposure began early in his presidency, when a large number of front-page posting began to be about him.

I would expect this kind of exposure on a denominational web-site where the denomination is episcopal in polity. So why, in a congregationaly governed denomination, do we have a president who is exposed on the UUA website as if he were minister to a national congregation? Maybe I’m quibbling over small details, but I thought we were still the Unitarian Universalist Association of CongregationS (the big-S is to emphasize plural congregations).

]]>