<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philocrites: Report on UUA Board&#8217;s January meeting.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boyinthebands.com/archives/philocrites-report-on-uua-boards-january-meeting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/philocrites-report-on-uua-boards-january-meeting/</link>
	<description>Scott Wells on the practice of Christian faith</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philocrites</title>
		<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/philocrites-report-on-uua-boards-january-meeting/#comment-7387</link>
		<dc:creator>Philocrites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universalistchurch.net/boyinthebands/archives/philocrites-report-on-uua-boards-january-meeting/#comment-7387</guid>
		<description>I'm not going to get into your general concerns with CLF itself, since I don't think I understand some of them and probably disagree with others, but I do want to clarify something: I think you're talking about the "Church of the &lt;em&gt;Younger&lt;/em&gt; Fellowship" idea — a proposal that was spawned by the young adults over at FUUSE, who for whatever range of reasons identify with the denomination but find local congregations a hard nut to crack. (They are, unfortunately, especially for college students.) My understanding is that these young adults took the idea to CLF, which saw some value in it that I can plainly understand. At the moment, CLF does better ministry-at-a-distance using e-mail and the Web than any other institution in the UUA. That model makes sense for a lot of younger young adults. I also understand that CLF chose to focus the program only on young adults, since ain't nobody gonna do your youth ministry if the local congregation won't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to get into your general concerns with CLF itself, since I don&#8217;t think I understand some of them and probably disagree with others, but I do want to clarify something: I think you&#8217;re talking about the &#8220;Church of the <em>Younger</em> Fellowship&#8221; idea — a proposal that was spawned by the young adults over at FUUSE, who for whatever range of reasons identify with the denomination but find local congregations a hard nut to crack. (They are, unfortunately, especially for college students.) My understanding is that these young adults took the idea to CLF, which saw some value in it that I can plainly understand. At the moment, CLF does better ministry-at-a-distance using e-mail and the Web than any other institution in the UUA. That model makes sense for a lot of younger young adults. I also understand that CLF chose to focus the program only on young adults, since ain&#8217;t nobody gonna do your youth ministry if the local congregation won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
