<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OK, another one for the FuglyChalice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boyinthebands.com/archives/ok-another-one-for-the-fuglychalice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/ok-another-one-for-the-fuglychalice/</link>
	<description>Scott Wells on the practice of Christian faith</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Wells</title>
		<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/ok-another-one-for-the-fuglychalice/#comment-17721</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 04:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universalistchurch.net/boyinthebands/archives/ok-another-one-for-the-fuglychalice/#comment-17721</guid>
		<description>It's Lutheran. (My family was nominally Lutheran, so perhaps I'm seeing more in it that need be. Derek, what's your take?) I see a parallel in the veining in the rose petals with the rays in the new UUA logo. Some people thought the new (renewed) chalice was rather cruciform (for good or bad). The use of blue is noteworthy, too. I should add that, as a logotype, I think Luther's Rose is way, way too busy and so it also compares with the new UUA logo that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Lutheran. (My family was nominally Lutheran, so perhaps I&#8217;m seeing more in it that need be. Derek, what&#8217;s your take?) I see a parallel in the veining in the rose petals with the rays in the new UUA logo. Some people thought the new (renewed) chalice was rather cruciform (for good or bad). The use of blue is noteworthy, too. I should add that, as a logotype, I think Luther&#8217;s Rose is way, way too busy and so it also compares with the new UUA logo that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lareinacobre</title>
		<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/ok-another-one-for-the-fuglychalice/#comment-17720</link>
		<dc:creator>lareinacobre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 02:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universalistchurch.net/boyinthebands/archives/ok-another-one-for-the-fuglychalice/#comment-17720</guid>
		<description>Are you saying this resembles the new UUA chalice logo? If so,  I'm not seeing it. I squinted, too. 

Whose emblem is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying this resembles the new UUA chalice logo? If so,  I&#8217;m not seeing it. I squinted, too. </p>
<p>Whose emblem is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
