<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No non-discrimination changes at GA?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boyinthebands.com/archives/no-non-discrimination-changes-at-ga/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/no-non-discrimination-changes-at-ga/</link>
	<description>Scott Wells on the practice of Christian faith</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philocrites</title>
		<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/no-non-discrimination-changes-at-ga/#comment-11415</link>
		<dc:creator>Philocrites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universalistchurch.net/boyinthebands/archives/no-non-discrimination-changes-at-ga/#comment-11415</guid>
		<description>Last year, the GA approved the second-year amendment you found -- but the Youth Caucus raised concerns about it, arguing that gender does not fully encompass sex and that ethnicity does not fully encompass color; other youth delegates, however, challenged that suggestion. At any rate, a question was raised about whether to introduce yet another two-year amendment to revise the thinking yet again. I haven't reviewed all the documents in the meantime, so there may be something more here, but I think it's really just a response to the concerns raised by the Youth Caucus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year, the GA approved the second-year amendment you found &#8212; but the Youth Caucus raised concerns about it, arguing that gender does not fully encompass sex and that ethnicity does not fully encompass color; other youth delegates, however, challenged that suggestion. At any rate, a question was raised about whether to introduce yet another two-year amendment to revise the thinking yet again. I haven&#8217;t reviewed all the documents in the meantime, so there may be something more here, but I think it&#8217;s really just a response to the concerns raised by the Youth Caucus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
