<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lectionaries redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boyinthebands.com/archives/lectionaries-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/lectionaries-redux/</link>
	<description>Scott Wells on the practice of Christian faith</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Soliday</title>
		<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/lectionaries-redux/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>David Soliday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universalistchurch.net/boyinthebands/archives/lectionaries-redux/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>At first I wanted to ask just what you mean by "world religion-ism" but I heave read Chutney's response and Rev. Parker's as well, and feel I have an inkling of what is meant.  I was most struck by Rev. Parker's description of "skimming on the surface of religious experience."  I can see how this can be annoying and leave one unfulfilled.  I also believe that some people--if not most--are only ready for the stuff on the surface.  It is the job of the minister, I am being taught, to meet people where they are and work/walk with them from there.

I also hadn't thought of the notion that "a 'many-centered' faith might seem exclusive to those who find sustenance from a single source."  This is a bit perplexing to me as well, considering my chosen career path.  I would like to say that each congregation can have its own theological or philosophical center, but my experience is that congregations have various factions represented within them.  I suppose there must be congregations out there in our denomination that have a primary center and not much other variety represented.

If you care to elaborate on your criticism, I'm attentive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I wanted to ask just what you mean by &#8220;world religion-ism&#8221; but I heave read Chutney&#8217;s response and Rev. Parker&#8217;s as well, and feel I have an inkling of what is meant.  I was most struck by Rev. Parker&#8217;s description of &#8220;skimming on the surface of religious experience.&#8221;  I can see how this can be annoying and leave one unfulfilled.  I also believe that some people&#8211;if not most&#8211;are only ready for the stuff on the surface.  It is the job of the minister, I am being taught, to meet people where they are and work/walk with them from there.</p>
<p>I also hadn&#8217;t thought of the notion that &#8220;a &#8216;many-centered&#8217; faith might seem exclusive to those who find sustenance from a single source.&#8221;  This is a bit perplexing to me as well, considering my chosen career path.  I would like to say that each congregation can have its own theological or philosophical center, but my experience is that congregations have various factions represented within them.  I suppose there must be congregations out there in our denomination that have a primary center and not much other variety represented.</p>
<p>If you care to elaborate on your criticism, I&#8217;m attentive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyIrony.com</title>
		<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/lectionaries-redux/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>MyIrony.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universalistchurch.net/boyinthebands/archives/lectionaries-redux/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What I'm actually missing&lt;/strong&gt;
After reading the several replies to my post on Unitarian Universalist liturgy, I now know that there is stuff out there, and stuff is still being written. I'm going to chalk my ignorance up to being a (relatively) new UU. But I've also realized that w...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What I&#8217;m actually missing</strong><br />
After reading the several replies to my post on Unitarian Universalist liturgy, I now know that there is stuff out there, and stuff is still being written. I&#8217;m going to chalk my ignorance up to being a (relatively) new UU. But I&#8217;ve also realized that w&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
