<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: International meeting to use Skype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boyinthebands.com/archives/international-meeting-to-use-skype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/international-meeting-to-use-skype/</link>
	<description>Scott Wells on the practice of Christian faith</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jaume</title>
		<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/international-meeting-to-use-skype/#comment-46413</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boyinthebands.com/archives/international-meeting-to-use-skype/#comment-46413</guid>
		<description>Thanks for quoting and the link! Skype is most useful for international PC-to-phone calls, because rates are amazingly cheap. I also wonder about the audio quality of a skypecast. Although one-to-one conversation are usually of good quality, my experience with more than 4 participants in a single conversation is poor quality and unwelcome screeching, but that was with a regular multiuser call, and the skypecast mode may work differently. We'll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for quoting and the link! Skype is most useful for international PC-to-phone calls, because rates are amazingly cheap. I also wonder about the audio quality of a skypecast. Although one-to-one conversation are usually of good quality, my experience with more than 4 participants in a single conversation is poor quality and unwelcome screeching, but that was with a regular multiuser call, and the skypecast mode may work differently. We&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
