<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boy in the Bands, now under a liberal license</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boyinthebands.com/archives/boy-in-the-bands-now-under-a-liberal-license/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/boy-in-the-bands-now-under-a-liberal-license/</link>
	<description>Scott Wells on the practice of Christian faith</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PeaceBang</title>
		<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/boy-in-the-bands-now-under-a-liberal-license/#comment-46401</link>
		<dc:creator>PeaceBang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boyinthebands.com/archives/boy-in-the-bands-now-under-a-liberal-license/#comment-46401</guid>
		<description>Maybe it's my toddler-addled brain, but I'm confused. Excuse my ignorance, but I bet I'm not the only dummy  out there on this. My main question is, "How does this change anything?" Because wouldn't any ethical person attribute you appropriately even without a license? And wouldn't (and haven't) you do/done the same? And wouldn't sloppy or unethical people continue to quote you or snippet you without proper attribution even with a license?

Is this more of a legal thing or is it more of a community-ethos thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s my toddler-addled brain, but I&#8217;m confused. Excuse my ignorance, but I bet I&#8217;m not the only dummy  out there on this. My main question is, &#8220;How does this change anything?&#8221; Because wouldn&#8217;t any ethical person attribute you appropriately even without a license? And wouldn&#8217;t (and haven&#8217;t) you do/done the same? And wouldn&#8217;t sloppy or unethical people continue to quote you or snippet you without proper attribution even with a license?</p>
<p>Is this more of a legal thing or is it more of a community-ethos thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peregrinato</title>
		<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/boy-in-the-bands-now-under-a-liberal-license/#comment-46397</link>
		<dc:creator>Peregrinato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boyinthebands.com/archives/boy-in-the-bands-now-under-a-liberal-license/#comment-46397</guid>
		<description>I'm on a Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Generic license. I should probably review it and compare. I've had it since the early days of my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on a Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Generic license. I should probably review it and compare. I&#8217;ve had it since the early days of my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Murrain</title>
		<link>http://boyinthebands.com/archives/boy-in-the-bands-now-under-a-liberal-license/#comment-46395</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Murrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boyinthebands.com/archives/boy-in-the-bands-now-under-a-liberal-license/#comment-46395</guid>
		<description>Great idea! Glad you've decided to take the plunge! :-) My blog has been CC licensed with the same license. It's a great idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea! Glad you&#8217;ve decided to take the plunge! :-) My blog has been CC licensed with the same license. It&#8217;s a great idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
